Analysis top
Intro Images Analysis Teknik Comparison Table Recommendations
Wide-open
The Voigtländer 20mm f/3.5 looks the best, with the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR just as good.
The other four lenses all look similar, with the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s having a little more resolution hidden in all the veiling coma flare.
This is a good showing for the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s, as it is a stop faster than the other lenses; it's shooting at f/2.8 while the others are at f/3.5 or f/4.
f/4
The Voigtländer 20mm f/3.5 looks the best, with the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR as good and the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s almost as good.
The other lenses trail, and the Nikon 20mm f/3.5 UD is worst.
f/5.6
At f/5.6 there is a surprising change of events, and the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s is now in first place!
The Voigtländer 20mm f/3.5 and Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR are almost as good.
The Nikon 20mm f/3.5 AI-s, Nikon 20mm f/4 AI and Nikon 20mm f/3.5 UD are equally bad.
f/8
At f/8, where you actually shoot in daylight, the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s is still in first place!
The Voigtländer 20mm f/3.5 and Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR are tied for second.
The Nikon 20mm f/4 AI is in third place.
The Nikon 20mm f/3.5 AI-s is in fourth place, and the Nikon 20mm f/3.5 UD is last.
Teknik top
Intro Images Analysis Teknik Comparison Table Recommendations
Everything was shot on a 12MP full-frame Nikon D3.
I used a tripod not for sharpness, but to try to hold each camera in the same position from shot-to-shot to help these images stay in alignment to make nice, neat looking comparisons.
I'm impressed that each lens had about the same real, effective focal length and that the framing matched so closely.
I equalized exposure so that all images look as bright as each other.
Comparison Table top
Intro Images Analysis Teknik Comparison Table Recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anni |
2010- |
2009- |
1984- |
1977-1984 |
1974-1978 |
1967-1974 |
Filter |
77mm |
52mm |
62mm |
52mm |
52mm |
52mm |
Threads |
Plastic |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Barrel |
Plastic |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Weight |
678g |
199.5g |
259g |
232g |
209g |
388g |
Weight |
23.9 oz. |
7.040 oz. |
9.1 oz. |
8.2 oz. |
7.4 oz. |
13.7 oz. |
Price, USA,
September 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations top
Intro Images Analysis Teknik Comparison Table Recommendations
The Voigtländer 20mm f/3.5 and Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR are best at larger apertures where performance differs the most among lenses, while the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s is the best when shot at the apertures where we'll usually be shooting it.
As if that didn't confuse things, what you folks can't possibly realize from the extremely limited number of samples I've shown here is how much this horse race varies depending on when and where you are looking.
To keep things even more confusing, at lest these mechanically sound manual-focus (and the VR zoom) are consistent from shot-to-shot and from left to right.
I've never shown this sort of comparison from zooms, because mechanical tolerances wiggle enough from shot-to-shot that the results very, and the results vary from one region of the image to the next.
When looked at this closely, the actual samples of ultrawide AF and zoom lenses you and I actually can buy never give symmetrical results from one side to the next due to all the manufacturing variations, which are extremely critical in ultrawides due to the short focal lengths.
I didn't bother trying to show the Autofocus 20/2.8 AF-D, which has the same optics on paper as the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s, because the mechanical slop in the AF mechanism of the 20mm f/2.8 AF-D renders results sloppy enough to make these single-image tests meaningless.
These samples are at very high magnifications. In actual photography, we're never peering at the corners this carefully. In actual shooting, there isn't any real difference among these lenses technically.
At f/2.8, the Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AI-s has lower contrast than the rest of these lenses due to all its coma, but none of these lenses go to f/2.8, so it doesn't matter.
The biggest thing I hope I've shown is how silly it can become to attempt to over-analyze these things, especially with these lenses that are surprisingly similar. If I had shown some other part of the image, the relative results would all change again.
Help me help you top
I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.
The biggest help is when you use any of these links to Adorama, Amazon, B&H, eBay, Ritz, Calumet and J&R and
when you get anything. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of support. eBay is always a gamble, but all the other places always have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you find this
page as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may
have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.
If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you're family. It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!
Thanks for reading!
Mr. & Mrs. Ken Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.
Home Donate New Search Gallery How-To Books Links Workshops About Contact
|