The DX Dream Team
This free website's biggest source of support is when you use any of these links to approved sources when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live — but I receive nothing for my efforts if you take a chance and buy elsewhere. I get no government hand-outs and run no pledge drives to support my research, so please always use any of these links to approved sources for the best prices, service and selection whenever you get anything. Thanks for helping me help you! Ken.
Nikon has been making FX lenses since the 1950s. There are a zillion of them, all of which work with varying levels of compatibility on DX cameras.
We're in luck, since some of these few DX lenses made by Nikon just happen to be exactly what we need for shooting anything with DX cameras.
You're far better off spending your money on these Dream Team lenses and a D3200 than throwing limited money away on fancier cameras.
The Dream Team will outfit you for anything, but I rarely carry even three lenses. All I usually carry is the 35mm f/1.8 DX and I'm set.
Nikon 18-55mm II kit lens. (52mm filters, 7.2 oz/203g.)
Personally, I usually shoot with only the 35mm f/1.8 and leave the rest at home. I move a few steps closer or further away to frame, and I'm good. The 35mm f/1.8 is a tougher, faster lens than the basic 18-55mm zoom.
Nikon 35mm f/1.8 DX (52mm filters, 6.95 oz/197.0g).
The Dream Team top
Either single lens above is all you really need. Pick one, and go.
If you insist on buying more lenses, here are the only two or three you'll ever need for everything on DX cameras.
If you use the lenses below, leave the 18-55mm at home. Never carry lenses whose ranges overlap. I'm very serious about this. If you carry any lenses which overlap, you'll not only have to lug them all over, you'll miss photos as you waste your time wondering which lens to use for each shot and spend time jamming them on and off your camera. See also Assembling a System.
A pro photographer carries only two lenses, often on two dedicated bodies. With these, he's prepared for everything.
One lens is a wide zoom, and the other is a tele zoom. Often a pro throws a fast, fixed, normal lens in his pocket for low light, but that's it. Anyone who carries more is probably an amateur who doesn't shoot often enough to thin out his bag.
Pros know they don't need to cover every millimeter of focal length. The difference between the long end of the wide lens and short end of the tele lens is close enough that a few steps forward or back makes up the difference. Pros don't bother with mid-range zooms, although some wedding photographers will use a midrange zoom and nothing else.
These three lenses comprise the Dream Team for Nikon DX digital cameras. With these three lenses, you have everything you'd ever need.
Nikon makes just a few lenses specifically for DX, and luckily, a few of these just happen to be exactly what we need for DX cameras.
Click any of the lenses or links for detailed reviews.
Wide: 10-24mm top
Nikon 10-24mm (77mm filters, 16.3 oz/463g).
This is the newest lens on the Dream Team, available since May 2009. (It's a lighter-duty version of the older semi-pro 12-24mm, either of which are great lenses.)
Either offers superb performance with moderate weight.
It is the heaviest and most expensive lens on the Dream Team.
The Dream Team are lenses for serious photographers, and this is a seriously wide lens. (see How to Use Ultrawide Lenses.)
Fast Normal: 35mm f/1.8 top
Nikon 35mm f/1.8 (52mm filters, 6.95 oz/197.0g).
The Nikon 35mm f/1.8 is spectacular, especially when you consider that it sells for only $200.
For many photographers, including myself, I could quite happily shoot with nothing but this lens on my camera all day and night.
Tele Zoom: 55-200mm VR top
Nikon 55-200mm VR (52mm filter, 11.805 oz/334.6g).
This $200 tele lens is magnificent. It is optically one of Nikon's best lenses, and handles and works great on every DX camera.
More advantages are that it weighs next to nothing, it takes the same 52mm filters as most Nikon lenses like the 18-55mm and 35mm f/1.8 lenses, and that is has Vibration Reduction (Image Stabilization) for sharp hand-held shots at every focal length.
The only negatives to this superb and compact $200 lens is that you need to be careful to grab the camera and not the lens, since the bayonet lens mount is plastic (this keeps weight down), and that you have to move a switch to get into manual focus mode. All the other lenses, except the 18-55mm kit lens, allow instant manual focus override simply by grabbing the focus ring.
I own huge pro f/2.8 tele zooms and the much larger 70-300mm VR, and I still prefer to shoot this 55-200mm VR lens when I shoot DX. I prefer its small size and focal length range.
You can pay more, but all you're getting will be tougher build quality, more weight, the need for bigger filters, instant manual-focus override, and lose the ability to zoom as short as 55mm.
If you really want to pay more (I don't), you can use either of the 70-300mm VR or 70-200mm f/2.8 VR on DX instead, but why pay that much money just to carry more weight? The only good reason is if you need f/2.8 for sports at night.
Get only one tele. If you get either of these, don't bother with any other like the 55-200mm.
Nikon 55-300mm VR (58mm filters, 18.6 oz./529g, $365).
If you prefer, you can spend more for the 55-300mm VR to get longer range and a metal lens mount. Otherwise, it's the same as the 55-200mm VR.
Nikon 70-300mm VR ($520, 67mm filter, 26.3oz/745g).
For action and sports, the semi-professional 70-300mm VR has much faster autofocussing. I'd sugest it instead of the 55-200 or 55-300 for action shots.
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II ($2,169, 77mm filter, 54.3 oz/1,540g).
Full-time pros use the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II. I doubt anyone really needs a lens this big and expensive, but if you shoot all day for a living, you'll love it.
What About the 18-200mm VR? top
The 18-200mm VR II isn't a team player; it's a prima-donna that works best by itself.
The 18-200 is awesome, and is all most people need.
If you carry an 18-200mm VR, carry nothing else except the 35/1.8 for the dark.
If you carry the 10-24mm, do not carry the heavy 18-200mm VR because it duplicates part of the range. If you're going to carry the 10-24mm, bring the 55-200mm VR instead of the bulkier 18-200mm VR.
The 18-200mm VR takes a 72mm filter, while all the other lenses except the 10-24mm take standard 52mm filters.
What About the 28-300mm VR? top
Some people may prefer the combination of this 28-300mm and the 10-24mm to cover everytning. Add the 35/1.8 for low-light.
It's more to buy and carry, but you'll be set for everything, including action and sports.
With the new 18-300mm DX, forget this FX 28-300mm lens.
Yes, FX cameras downgrade themselves automatically to DX if you attach one of these DX lenses, but you'll only be using the center of your sensor and viewfinder. You'll quickly tire of that.
Even though Nikon touts "Compatible!," you'll wind up buying FX lenses for any FX camera you buy.
Help me help you top
I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.
The biggest help is when you use any of these links when you get anything. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of support. eBay is always a gamble, but all the other places always have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you find this page as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.
As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!
Thanks for reading!